Launching SoonAllocated physical goldStored with Loomis in Dubai
eona

NEWS

Peter Schiff Calls Rising Yields ‘Most Bullish’ for Gold, Warns on U.S. Debt

He sees the bond sell-off extending, envisions 9% mortgages and potential 30%–50% home‑price declines, and says he holds more in gold miners than bullion.

October 9, 2026

Peter Schiff Calls Rising Yields ‘Most Bullish’ for Gold, Warns on U.S. Debt

Bond Sell-Off and Gold

Peter Schiff said Thursday that the ongoing sell-off in U.S. bonds — which has pushed borrowing costs to a 24‑year high — is only getting started, and he described rising yields as “the most bullish thing” for gold. In his view, upward pressure on Treasury yields signals deepening concerns about fiscal sustainability and the purchasing power of the dollar, factors he argues can support demand for the metal.

Schiff’s remarks frame a counterpoint to the conventional relationship in which higher yields often weigh on non‑yielding assets. He contends that when yields climb for the “wrong” reasons — namely, deteriorating public finances and inflation risk rather than robust real growth — gold can benefit as a defensive store of value.

Debt and Housing Risks

Extending that argument, Schiff warned that stress in government finances could ultimately force difficult choices. He said Washington could end up paying as little as 50 cents on the dollar on its obligations, highlighting the scale of adjustment he believes may be required if debt service costs continue to rise. He did not specify a timeline but tied the risk to the bond market’s repricing and the increase in borrowing costs across the economy.

He also pointed to housing as a transmission channel for higher rates. Schiff said 30‑year mortgage rates could reach around 9%, a level he linked to the potential for home prices to fall by 30% to 50%. Such declines, he suggested, would reflect reduced affordability and tighter credit conditions if elevated yields persist. These projections underscore his view that the current rate regime could have broader asset‑price consequences beyond sovereign debt.

Positioning and Context

Against this backdrop, Schiff noted that he holds more of his own money in gold miners than in bullion. He did not elaborate on specific holdings or rationale, but the comment indicates a personal preference for equity exposure to the sector over direct metal in his portfolio. Miner equities can exhibit higher volatility and operational risk relative to allocated bullion, while offering leverage to changes in metal prices.

While Schiff’s thesis emphasizes gold’s potential resilience in a high‑yield environment driven by fiscal strain, market behavior can be mixed. Historically, rising real yields and a firmer dollar have at times pressured bullion, even as periods of fiscal uncertainty and inflation concern have supported it. The balance between these forces remains a central question as investors assess the durability of the current rate structure and its spillovers to housing, corporate finance, and sovereign funding.

For those prioritizing direct metal ownership without issuer or operational exposure, allocated and vaulted bullion provides title to specific bars and mitigates counterparty risk unrelated to mining operations.